Have you ever read 2001: A Space Odyssey?
Or seen the movie?
I just picked up the book at a bookstore this weekend.
And coincidentally, this is what I read last night:
“if one could carry out a prolonged conversation with a machine without being able to distinguish between its replies and those that a man might give, then the machine was thinking.”
It’s coincidence, because yesterday I asked you to guess which definition of “both” was written by a human teacher and which was written by AI.
Here are the definitions again:
Definition one: two together
Definition two: used to emphasis two things at the same time
The replies on the blog were about 50:50.
Half of you gave one answer and the other half the other answer.
It seems it’s already not so easy to tell the difference between the human intelligence and the artificial intelligence.
What’s next?
Have a great weekend,
Mr. Vig
P.S.
AI wrote “two together”
And the human teacher wrote: “used to emphasis two things at the same time”
Hi,
There are different AI app, some are better but still not perfect. I’v got bored when I got same answer from AI no metter I wrote different messages in chats of some company/shop’s app.. After few messages they often “call” some agent which is human but some of them don’t, just repeat the same whatever you write… I hope that they won’t replace humans in all things, jobs,… I thought that the second was AI… Bye!
I Hope that I can be a number in your class
I found the right answers!!
Thanks for sharing your knowledge
Good to the AI! After I gave you my reply yesterday, I thought for a second that the second answer could be the teacher’s definition because it was more complicate and not so simple and exact like the first one. But I’ve met my decision already. Sorry, it was wrong.
Human intelligence is wide and strong than Al.
You are right , human can better define then AI
I didn’t see this question, but I would have obviously given the second answer!
EURECA!!!!
I found the correct answer!!!
I hope and wish forever the Artificial Intelligence to pursue the Human Intelligence and not the reverse.
Only this would have a positive impact in our lives.
I don’t want to imagine what would be happened if AI would overcame HI
The end of humanity?
Hi Ryan,
My answer was wrong : I thought AI wrote definition 2.
But why ? Because when I ask Chat GPT a question, I noticed that he “imitates” perfectly the way a real person would answer. The sentences are clear, sometimes even sophisticated but neither short nor cut like a robot.
It was a trap.
Of course definition 2 is the best : more satisfying, more precise, written by someone who took time to explain, well written… by a human teacher !
I was wrong… and the ambiguity is already there.
This is the known Turing test which is much older than the book you cited. Today many computer science specialists think it’s outdated and should be replaced by a new more specific and precise one.
You said,Ryan, you think to create a new dictionary, but I wonder your old, good power word dictionary is still current? My idea, no matter is the same of AI, is that is good to simplify definitions…
Hi, akordding me second definition is better, because human explain is still better – description is better.
Just want to say I like it